﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0"><channel><ttl>60</ttl><title>Medical Billing Services Blog</title><link>http://blog.claimcare.biz</link><lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:46:32 GMT</lastBuildDate><pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:46:32 GMT</pubDate><language>en</language><copyright /><itunes:subtitle> </itunes:subtitle><itunes:author /><itunes:summary /><description /><itunes:owner><itunes:name /><itunes:email>carl.mays@claimcare.net</itunes:email></itunes:owner><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:category text="Arts" /><item><title>Medical Billing Services and Revenue Cycle Denial Management</title><link>http://blog.claimcare.biz/2008/10/07/medical-billing-services-and-revenue-cycle-denial-management.aspx?ref=rss</link><dc:creator>Medical Billing Services</dc:creator><description>&lt;P class=Default style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Revenue Cycle Denial Management has become a universal and often abused term in medical billing. Some use the term to describe a means of addressing claims denied for medical necessity. Others use the term to describe how some information is tracked for a specific payer, set of procedures or a place of service.&amp;nbsp; Still others try to use it to describe what they do daily in the physician’s office. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you were to ask your billing department or a current &lt;A href="http://www.claimcare.net/" target=_blank&gt;medical billing company&lt;/A&gt; (1) what is their Revenue Cycle Denial Management strategy; (2) what process do they use to methodically measure it and (3) what are the quantifiable results of it, you would most likely get a lot of blank stares.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Few billing departments appreciate the value a good Revenue Cycle Denial Management system can bring to a medical practice. A robust Revenue Cycle Denial Management system provides methodical management data for the billing process; the data are then used to (a) increase and (b) accelerate cash flow. The system accomplishes this needed service by tracking, quantifying, and reporting on every claim billed for which any payer denied the service. The reporting should be comprehensive, tracking all denials (not just selected denials). If used properly, the system can reduce first-time claim denials by over 50 percent. In our experience we’ve come across many practices with no way of monitoring if the payer is denying their claims at excessive or unwarranted rates, or even for what reason. These practices are probably losing 10-20 percent of their total revenue. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR&gt;What is typically missing from troubled billing operations is the lack of the management-reporting expertise needed to extract the data in a concise and meaningful way coupled with a lack of methodical, measured billing process needed to correct mistakes. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;ClaimCare &lt;A href="http://www.claimcare.net/" target=_blank&gt;Medical Billing Services&lt;/A&gt;'&amp;nbsp;comprehensive Revenue Cycle Denial Management system has two main purposes. First, to provide feedback on why and how many claims are not being paid on the first submission to the respective payers. The second is to fix these issues. ClaimCare Medical Billing Services' Revenue Cycle Denial Management software databases have been designed to track, quantify, and report on all denials for all payers. The standard output tracks, by payer, the number of claims denied and the reason for the denials. This is coupled with our Dashboard reporting for a quick visual management. With these unique reports our team can easily identify which payers are inappropriately denying claims; we can also compare these payers to their peers for proper trending and follow-up. The unique output for each practice allows us to refine the payer specific rules and build our own rules to prevent future payer denials. Payers that are chronic violators are pursued to resolve how and when they intend to process and pay outstanding claims. If the issues persist, there may be grounds to charge penalties stipulated by the Clean Claim Law (to the extent it exists in the state). Only by quantifying and analyzing the problem can you discover how to improve on the process. A real Revenue Cycle Denial Management system gives you a way to optimize and accelerate cash flow. ClaimCare Medical Billing Services' system has a proven track record of improving revenues between 5-20 percent.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;To learn more visit &lt;A href="http://www.claimcare.net/" target=_blank&gt;ClaimCare Medical Billing Services&lt;/A&gt;' website.&lt;/P&gt;</description><comments>http://blog.claimcare.biz/2008/10/07/medical-billing-services-and-revenue-cycle-denial-management.aspx#Comments</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">a9f6ad83-1dbf-4b66-adbb-186800b4866c</guid><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 18:58:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Medical Billing Services Must Utilize Scrubbers</title><link>http://blog.claimcare.biz/2008/09/17/medicalbillingservices3.aspx?ref=rss</link><dc:creator>Medical Billing Services</dc:creator><description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;One of the most important things in billing is to create and follow a very structured plan that can be measured each step of the way. Remember, if it cannot be measured and monitored it cannot be improved! &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Clean claim submission can reduce average days in AR to less than 45 days &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;The leading&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://www.claimcare.net/" target=_blank&gt;medical billing services&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;operations utilize scrubbers that ensure your claims are clean before they are submitted to payers. These scrubs accelerate the speed of collections by avoiding denials and delays. They also increase collections by minimizing the volume of “re-work” and allowing billing staff to focus their efforts on pursuing true collections improvement opportunities and not simply resubmitting claims that should have been paid the first time. As a result of these scrubbers, over 90% of claims submitted are paid upon first submission. These “scrubbers” include: &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Basic mechanical scrubber &lt;/STRONG&gt;that assures that all claim fields have been properly filled with formatted data (social security number with 9 digits, date of birth etc), the NPI is in a proper field, there is a referring physician if needed, etc. &lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Scrubber &lt;/STRONG&gt;that checks coding,&amp;nbsp;bundling, and procedure information versus local Medicare and CCI rules. This scrub assures better coding, identifies overlooked procedures or codes. &lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The truly great medical billing specialists can rely on medical billing specific know-how and business intelligence created over time through work with many medical practices and facilities in the given payer relevant geographic area. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Dynamic Proprietary Rule scrubber&lt;/STRONG&gt; that checks for optimal coding and documentation versus the particular payer or plan’s rules. This scrub assures that each claim is optimized for clean submission. When the payer or plan’s rules change or when the billing office detects a systemic issue they can update the scrubber to filter and fix problems before claims go out. These specialized scrubbers can make a significant collections difference. &lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;At&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://www.claimcare.net/" target=_blank&gt;ClaimCare Medical Billing Services&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;we have found that these actions can decrease the medical practice's collections cycle by up to 40-50 days. This is why you need to insure this critical step is being completed no matter who is doing your Medical Billing. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;If you would like to learn more please visit&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://www.claimcare.net/" target=_blank&gt;ClaimCare Medical Billing Services&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;website.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description><comments>http://blog.claimcare.biz/2008/09/17/medicalbillingservices3.aspx#Comments</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">bb5d1bc5-1b7a-4e80-824e-4af836301bb0</guid><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 22:15:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Medical Billing Services: Good ones fight rising healthcare costs</title><link>http://blog.claimcare.biz/2008/08/13/fighting-rising-health-care-costs.aspx?ref=rss</link><dc:creator>Medical Billing Services</dc:creator><description>Everyone hears about the fact that much of the cost of healthcare is driven by the expense of processing and adjudicating claims. What is often not mentioned is what is truly at the root of these expenses - payers that are attempting to withhold from physicians the money they are due. I mentioned in an &lt;A href="http://blog.claimcare.biz/2008/08/10/temp.aspx" target=_blank&gt;earlier entry&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;how &lt;A href="http://www.claimcare.net/" target=_blank&gt;ClaimCare Medical Billing Services&lt;/A&gt; constantly sees payers systematically underpaying claims. We also see claims that have been&amp;nbsp;properly submitted and for which we have proof the claim was accepted simply "lost" by payers and the claims have to be resubmitted (sometimes multiple times) in order to secure payment. Now, here is&amp;nbsp;a shocking fact - over 50% of claims that are "lost" or are underpaid are never pursued by physicians (and therefore the payers never have to pay the money&amp;nbsp;they owe&amp;nbsp;to the physician or facility). This means that payers have a powerful economic incentive to play games and make the medical billing process complicated. Here is another shocking fact - it costs the average insurance company about $25 each time a representative has to get on the phone and discuss a lost or underpaid claim with a medical billing specialist. A final key fact is that most payers "grade" each provider. The lower&amp;nbsp;a provider's&amp;nbsp;grade (i.e., a D versus an A) the more likely the payers&amp;nbsp;are to lose or under pay&amp;nbsp;the provider's&amp;nbsp;claims. Why? Because these providers have no track record of catching these problems and pursuing them.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;So, how do all of these fact tie into my title about Medical Billing Services fighting the rising cost of healthcare? If each and every underpaid&amp;nbsp;or lost claim is pursued (which is what Medical Billing Services should do because they have the scale&amp;nbsp;to have groups of people that do nothing but follow-up on such claims) then eventually payers will lose all economic incentive to play games and make the billing process complicated and expensive. Imagine if every physician pursued every claim until it was paid in full. The payers would see their cost to adjudicate the claims rise and they would see their payments to providers rise because the lost/under paid claim games would no longer prevent providers from ultimately being paid. This combination would lead to each physician ultimately being paid quickly and without fuss because the insurance companies would lose significant money by playing games ($25 per extra phone call generated by the games)&amp;nbsp;and they would gain nothing&amp;nbsp;since payments would only be delayed, not avoided. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;There is&amp;nbsp;lots of&amp;nbsp;talk about the dream system where claim adjudication happens in real time and physicians immediately receive their reimbursements. Such a system will never happen until the economic incentive payers have to maintain a difficult, complicated and veiled system are removed. This, is what medical billing companies can do by doggedly pursuing each claim and insuring that every one of their clients is rated an "A" by all of their payers.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;For more information visit &lt;A href="http://www.claimcare.net/" target=_blank&gt;ClaimCare Medical Billing Services&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;or go to the &lt;A href="http://www.claimcare.net/ContactUs.shtml" target=_blank&gt;Contact Us&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;page.</description><comments>http://blog.claimcare.biz/2008/08/13/fighting-rising-health-care-costs.aspx#Comments</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">2e36e839-e2c1-4a3b-a1c4-08c6da81b9c7</guid><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 06:44:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Texas Medical Billing Tip of the Day - Use the Clean Claim law</title><link>http://blog.claimcare.biz/2008/08/10/texas-medical-billing-1.aspx?ref=rss</link><dc:creator>Medical Billing Services</dc:creator><description>Texas has one of the most helpful and powerful clean claim laws in the United States. The penalties for a clean claim violation can go all the way up to the payer being required to pay billed charges; that's right &lt;STRONG&gt;billed charges&lt;/STRONG&gt;. The basic idea of the law is that a payer has to respond to a clean claim within 30 days (45 days if it is not submitted electronically). In order to utilize the clean claim law effectively you must have a tracking system built into your medical billing process that flags:&lt;BR&gt;
&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Which payers are subject to the clean a claim law (not all are), &lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;When a claim was submitted, &lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;When a request fro information was received from the payer (if you receive one then&amp;nbsp;it stops the 30 day clock until you respond), &lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;When your office responded to the information request (this starts the 30 day clock again), and &lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;When you received a payment or denial. &lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The design and implementation of the system and reporting can challenging, but it will pay huge dividends in terms of the penalties from payers and in the way in which you will make&amp;nbsp;payers take notice of your claims next time. At &lt;A href="http://www.claimcare.net/" target=_blank&gt;ClaimCare Medical Billing Services&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;we have used&amp;nbsp;our clean claim tracking system&amp;nbsp;extensively and have seen significant rewards for our clients. We have actually received calls from managers at some of our payers that have assured us they would process our claims quickly and asked if we would please stop submitting complaints.&lt;/P&gt;If you would like more information on this please fill out &lt;A href="http://www.claimcare.net/ContactUs.shtml" target=_blank&gt;ClaimCare's Contact Us&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;page.</description><comments>http://blog.claimcare.biz/2008/08/10/texas-medical-billing-1.aspx#Comments</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">67fd0988-93bd-4556-bd8f-f68abbf7c4c1</guid><pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 22:30:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Outsource Medical Billing Must Have: Comparison to Allowables</title><link>http://blog.claimcare.biz/2008/08/10/temp.aspx?ref=rss</link><dc:creator>Medical Billing Services</dc:creator><description>If you make the decision to outsource medical billing, then make sure your medical billing company compares your payments to your allowables. It goes without saying, that if you do billing in-house the comparison still should be done. One of the advantages a Medical Billing Service has is that it sees payment information and patterns across many clients for many payers. This allows medical billing services that regularly and systematically compare payments to contractual allowables to spot patterns that a single practice might miss. One that is seen at &lt;A href="http://www.claimcare.net/" target=_blank&gt;ClaimCare Medical Billing Services&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;on a regular basis is the systematic underpayment of claims by payers. As we look across multiple clients we will see the exact same CPTs being underpaid by the same amount by the same payer in a given month across all of our clients. The following month we will see the same payer switch to underpaying a different set of CPTs. These under payments are not huge (5 to 10 percent) but they add up quickly to big dollars for a medical practice. The combination of switching the codes being underpaid from month-to-month and keeping the underpayment amount "under the radar" can make this difficult for an individual practice to spot. It is also difficult for a Medical Billing Service to spot if they are not comparing your payments to your contracted rates. At&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://www.claimcare.net/" target=_blank&gt;ClaimCare&lt;/A&gt; we have found that this single action (comparison of payments to allowables) can increase a medical practice's collections by 5 to 10 percent. This is why you need to insure this critical step is being completed no matter who is doing your Medical Billing.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;If you would like to learn more please visit &lt;A href="http://www.claimcare.net/ContactUs.shtml" target=_blank&gt;ClaimCare's Contact Us&lt;/A&gt; page.</description><comments>http://blog.claimcare.biz/2008/08/10/temp.aspx#Comments</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">c5a26024-97ff-44f8-a94a-be1dcb8e50bb</guid><pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 22:22:00 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
